The Verdict - PDFSEARCH.IO - Document Search Engine

The Verdict
Results: 479

#	Item
141	On October 31, 2005, the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the district court’s judgment entering the jury verdict that U.S. Patents No. 5,997,553 and No. 5,681,329, which related to castration tools, were not infr Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-12-07 07:28:41 Patent United States patent law Priority right Claim Term of patent Sufficiency of disclosure Continuing patent application Patent prosecution Patent law Law Prior art
142	On June 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, affirmed the district court’s judgment entering the jury verdict that Atlas did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,439,346, which related to turbine grinder rotary speed go Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-07-01 10:06:23 Jury Appeal Patent infringement Expert witness Law Legal procedure Motion
143	On March 16, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part and remanded the district court’s judgment following the jury verdict that the defendants infringed U.S. Patents No. 5,845,265, Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-03-30 13:26:39 Intellectual property law MercExchange Patent Business method patent Injunction Auction software Law Civil law Patent law
144	Digital jury - the final verdict Stephen Coleman with Barry Griffiths and Eleanor Simmons The authors Stephen Coleman is Director of the Hansard Society e-democracy programme. Add to Reading List Source URL: www.ofcom.org.uk Language: English - Date: 2002-06-25 09:07:00 Technology Law Jury E-democracy Hansard Verdict Juries in England and Wales Juries Government Legal procedure
145	[Cite as Bungard v. Jeffers, 2014-Ohio[removed]IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WASHINGTON COUNTY KENNETH R. BUNGARD, JR., Add to Reading List Source URL: www.sconet.state.oh.us Language: English - Date: 2014-02-14 11:49:29 Jury Judgment notwithstanding verdict Directed verdict Judgment as a matter of law Civil procedure Law Motion
146	Verdict The Judicial Watch Because no one is above the law!® A News Publication from Judicial Watch Add to Reading List Source URL: www.judicialwatch.org Language: English - Date: 2012-08-14 03:46:35 Illegal immigration U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Judicial Watch Immigration law Immigration United States Secure Communities and administrative immigration policies Immigration detention in the United States Illegal immigration to the United States Crimes Human migration
147	On May 10, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacatedin-part and remanded the district court’s judgment entering the jury verdict that Smith & Nephew infringed U.S. Patents No. 5,697,536, No. Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-06-07 12:03:53 Surgery Electrodes Neurophysiology Electrochemistry Medicine Dermatologic surgery Electrosurgery
148	On June 28, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment entering the jury verdict that U.S. Patents No. 5,761,605 and No. 6,169,878, which related direct broadcast satellite service (DBS) from geos Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-07-01 10:07:43 Motion Judgment as a matter of law Evidence Government Law Juries Legal procedure
149	On May 23, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s entry of judgment upon the jury verdict that Imonex infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,911,280, which related to coin selectors, and the award of $1,396,872 i Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-06-07 12:04:51 Patent infringement Ecolab v. FMC United States patent law Patent law Law
150	HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS Prepared for the use of trial jurors serving in the United States district courts under the supervision of the Judicial Conference of the United Stat Add to Reading List Source URL: mow.uscourts.gov Language: English - Date: 2012-07-13 14:10:28 Jury Juries in England and Wales Verdict Jury selection Tanner v. United States Juries Law Government

UPDATE